Skip to main content


Yesterday the Fed surprised the market by announcing that it would leave its policy of printing $85B per month and purchasing with this newly-minted cash a mix of MBS and UST in the open market.  What made this announcement surprising was that most economists had already forecast that the Fed would taper their printing and purchases by at least $10B/month in order to begin to reduce the world’s dependency on the Fed, and in reflection of the much-pronounced economic recovery.

Based upon the Fed’s decision, it would appear that perhaps the recovery may not be as robust as many would like to believe.  There is no other explanation for this decision.  In the meantime, the distortion in the markets for asset prices continues and the day of reckoning gets pushed out further.  More investors, who may have been holding out some dry powder to invest when markets correct and asset values reflect fundamental value, will now be induced to throw in the towel and capitulate to the Fed’s seeming desire to have everyone all in.  I heard that one very well-known hedge fund, run by some of the smarter folks out there, is now 50% cash.  There are lots of clues out there.  Seems to me that many are choosing to ignore them and play the momentum trade.  So far, this has paid off well.  Someday it won’t.  

Popular posts from this blog

Chicken Kiev with my Apple Pie, Please

I write this piece because I love the foundation upon which our nation was built, and want to preserve that for my kids. In short, I simply cannot abide by a society that is so monolithic in its perspective, so quick to condemn without knowledge, so easily herded into a single way of thinking, and so willing to categorize anyone with a different opinion as being evil or ignorant as how I see society currently operates. It is frightening to me that we’ve descended into a society wherein people are reluctant to speak or question for fear of being ostracized or worse. This is not the country I want for my family.

What If Credit Tightened By Even 1%?

This week I read an article about a company that offers personal loans to folks who are seriously down and out. One of their strategies involves mailing checks for $2,000 to these people’s homes and if the check is cashed it activates a loan agreement that calls for the borrower/check-casher to repay the loan with interest at the incredible rate of 32% per year. Apparently, this is not uncommon and there are many companies engaged in similar business. Of course, like many, my first reaction to this article was dismay or disgust, thinking that these poor and obviously desperate borrowers are being taken advantage of. Then, I began to think to myself what this says about the health of our financial system. I wondered to myself, if this lending were indeed curtailed, thus depriving these borrowers from access to credit, what the impact on the economy might be. I thought: Is it possible that we NEED these people to borrow and spend, lest the economy not achieve targeted growth rates, whic…

The Appeal of Socialism Examined

The political system that we all label “Socialism,” which I might define as one in which government displaces much of the private sector in providing for its citizens (healthcare, education, banking, resources, etc.) and controls the pricing for whatever is left to the private sector to administer, has never once succeeded in its stated objective of equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. In fact, it has always exacerbated the divide between rich and poor and has always led to depressing poverty for the masses. At the same time, free-market capitalism has raised the level of quality of life for most people, and in almost every single instance. And yet today, in the U.S. and elsewhere, we find that large segments of society favor socialism and distrust capitalism. And this is true even as our hemispheric neighbor Venezuela has experienced a complete collapse thanks to the 20-year pursuit of a socialist agenda. It begs the question of how this could be? Does anyone want t…