Skip to main content

The Responsibilities of Citizenship

In a massive bombing campaign to end World War II Allied forces, led by the U.S., destroyed many German cities.  Many civilians were killed and even more were displaced, their lives destroyed or devastated.  The rationale was that, while not every German was a committed Nazi, Germany as a whole had voted the Nazis into power and bore responsibility as a society for fostering and then tolerating the horrible deeds done during their reign.

The other day I was reading yet more revelations about our government’s spying on others
, and was struck when I read about the accusations that we were listening in on the German Chancellor’s cell phone.  This came within weeks of having recently read similar accusations with regards to the leaders of Mexico and Brazil.  I remarked to my wife how crazy this all seemed to me.  Why, I wondered, would we be spying on our allies, and specifically their leaders’ phones?  Who was making these decisions to do so? 

My wife, who was raised in Venezuela and Chile, ridiculed me as a naïve American.  She explained her beliefs to me that seemed too conspiracy thinking for my tastes, casting America in a villainous way.  I told her that the “America” she was referring to sounded a bit like a corporate-directed political monster aimed at world domination, which she seemed to agree with.  I explained to her that I was fairly certain that the CEO’s of major American companies were not in the room when the decision to wiretap the phones of foreign leaders was made.  I explained to her that I was an American and that I found the spying to be offensive, and was pretty sure that most Americans agreed with me.

And then the analogy to World War II Germany struck me.  My wife was (at least partially) right.  We Americans are naïve, and we have entrusted our nation’s leadership way too cavalierly and seemingly with way too few checks and balances.  Who the hell are these people at the NSA that made the decision to wiretap those phones?  Their actions are disgraceful and will surely lead to consequences that every American will bear in some way.  We may not be attacked militarily, as Nazi Germany was (although we may again one day), but we might very well lose our status as the global economic leader.  Nations may choose to boycott our products, or lean towards replacing our dollar as the global currency, each of which would bring painful consequences for us all.  

The bottom line is that we Americans have no excuses for turning blind eyes when our government does things that are inconsistent with our desires and our values.  We must hold our government accountable lest the world judge us by these actions.  And God help us then.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.