Skip to main content

Extremes

I have always believed that things are best proven and learned in the extremes.  For example, we have so many people who we call friends, however, how many would be there for you if it meant a real sacrifice on their behalf?  It is in those moments, when there is a test, that we discover reality.

Since last week my wife has received a continual stream of emails and texts from friends and family in Venezuela, who almost uniformly express shock and horror at the degradation of their previously proud society. Violence, both government-sponsored as well as civilian, has taken over the streets. It seems to me that disaster, with the real prospect of starvation, may be imminent as streets have been barricaded and normal societal systems can no longer function.   This is indeed an extreme situation.
Most of the communication comes from people hoping that the US, or anyone, come to their aid. Yet, amazingly, some are in complete denial, and these are the ones that fascinate me the most.  

One of these people is my father-in-law, who is a diehard Chavista socialist. For him, it is not acceptable or even conceivable that his socialist government could be at fault for the current situation. At first he blamed a small rogue group of anarchists who were "causing problems" but who would be quieted soon. Then, as the gravity of the situation became more apparent and he could no longer blame this "small group," he decided to parrot the current administration’s party line that it was the Americans who were instigating this chaos as a premise to invade Venezuela and take her oil, and that Leopoldo Lopez, the leader of the street marches, is a paid CIA operative.  Never mind that the U.S. has enough of our own oil, or that the oil market doesn't really work that way, or that Lopez comes from a long and historic Venezuelan family and was a mayor of a large district within Caracas. Logic or common sense never matters to ideologues or those who will always be victims. 

As an aside, I know our CIA has a history of meddling in other nation's affairs. But, being married to a Venezuelan, and having been exposed to many Venezuelans, I feel that I have a pretty good handle on some of the root problems of that country, and none of them have anything to do with the US or any other country.  Venezuelans did a great job screwing up their beautiful country and their warm and amazing society. Their education system continued to turn out students unqualified for gainful employment, they accepted a crazy high level of government corruption and outright theft as being the Venezuelan norm, and their businessmen chose to play that game in order to succeed. They looked the other way as the impoverished grew in numbers and in isolation and desperation, and assumed that the oil wealth could support the forever-increasing handouts. They looked the other way when Chavez undid their constitution, laughing with him as he joked and entertained, all the while destroying the fabric of their nation.  They ignored more ominous signs when Chavez shunned his nation's doctors to seek medical care in Cuba, and barely noticed the large influx of armed Cubans until now, when it may be too late. 

Venezuela is now royally fucked. Even if the world came in with either humanitarian help and/or military support for the freedom-seeking insurgents and frustrated citizens who seem to have finally awakened after decades of living in a fog, I think that righting this ship will take generations. The society is too damaged. The large percentage of the population who have no sense of right and wrong anymore, who have been living on subsidized or free beer and arepas and who have been fed populist and anti-American bullshit are likely incapable of becoming a part of a functioning society.  I would very much enjoy seeing all of the moronic Americans who have lent credibility to the Venezuelan totalitarian/socialist regime like Oliver Stone, Sean Penn, Danny Glover, and that always useful idiot Jimmy Carter to go down there now and see what they have contributed to. 

Well, the main point of this blog is the observation as to how powerful is the human ability is to live in complete denial.  In spite of his country literally burning around him, of mass repression, and unbelievable disintegration of society, my father-in-law still tows the “company line,” unwilling to question his beliefs and clinging to the victim mentality blame game. I’m afraid that we are all vulnerable to this same tendency, and need to be willing to always remain alert so as to learn from the realities in our midst, hear opposing points of view and criticism, and be willing to grow and change.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.