Skip to main content

Politics versus Governing

What is politics?  One of my kids recently asked me this question. For the past couple of weeks I've been watching the amazing Netflix show House of Cards, which depicts politicians as devious and manipulative and driven pretty much exclusively by their own self-interest. Based upon the polls of how Americans view their political leadership it seems that Americans see this theatrical depiction as being quite close to reality.

Recently I was speaking with a close friend who recounted a meeting he had sat in on with our President, who when confronted with a creative idea to help our economy responded to what seemed like a smart idea by suggesting that it wouldn't play well politically for him to get behind it. Needless to say, my friend left understanding just how futile this administration's efforts would be.


Also recently many of the private papers of the Clinton Administration were made available to the public. Disappointingly, yet perhaps not surprisingly, they revealed how much energy was expended on managing Hillary's public image. For anyone who really believes Mrs. Clinton to be a qualified candidate for running this country I’d ask them what exactly she’s done to persuade them?  She handled herself well at State dinners while married to Bill?  Surely her tenure at the State Department cannot be pointed to as having been qualifying her in any way.  Not a single area of her focus improved as a result of that focus.  And, there were some real doozy disasters starting with Benghazi and up to the Russian “reset.”   Let’s not even mention the Arab Spring and Egypt.  And yet, idiotically it seems, Mrs. Clinton is our clear front runner for the 2016 Democratic nomination and the Presidency.

So, I ask, what the hell is politics anyway?  It seems to me that it is a business that involves persuading the masses that one is qualified for a job, without really explaining either the requirements of the job or the supposed qualifications.  Politics is the business of winning elections.  To me, the job or career ought not be called politics but instead governing.  And, governing requires a deep understanding of a number of matters, probably most important among them economics/finance inasmuch as this area permeates everything.  The bottom line on all matters is whether we can afford to do things or not, right?  Also, governing involves managing tons of people, organizing them efficiently, understanding human behavior, comporting oneself in an exemplary manner, and, in the case of the leadership of the U.S. understanding that he/she is a representative of “freedom” for the entire world.  Finally, governing ought to require that a person possess a deep level of empathy and caring for his/her fellow man/woman.

Much worse than the Presidency, however, is our situation in Congress, where the election cycle is two years with no term limits.  This means that Congresspeople must be fundraising the large majority of their waking hours, rendering them rather useless in the area of governing.  Of course, there are people in politics who’ve devoted their lives to helping America and who are doing the best they can within the rules of the game they’re in.  I don’t mean to suggest here that we need to clean house in DC, although for sure I do think large-scale changes are in order.  As one of my old dear friends once said: “Don’t hate the players, hate the game.”  It would be so great to change the game, if only a bit.

I think we need a movement in America to re-do some of the basic problems that exist in our government and election structures.  Career politicians will not, I am certain, lead this movement inasmuch as they are a group that exists in response to current circumstances and who would be correctly threatened by any change.  Any ideas?  Anyone out there interested, or knows of organizations we can connect with?

Popular posts from this blog

"No, Not You. You Are Fake News."

"No, not you. You are fake news."  These were the words chosen by our president-elect to shut down a CNN reporter seeking to question him at his recent press conference. Many hearing those words surely recoiled, interpreting them as an affront to freedom and a form of censuring. I reacted quite differently, instead celebrating the moment that a strong leader decided to hold people accountable in a public manner for their actions.

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

James Harden - A Classic Case of Misunderstood Value

The last time I wrote on hoops was December 2013 when I presciently trashed Carmelo Anthony. The time has come to take out my poison pen once again to decry James Harden as a fraud. I know that Harden has amazing stats - third in scoring, first in assists, and that his team the Rockets have far exceeded expectations as they are currently the 3rd seed out west. But, I still maintain that he is an awful player.