Skip to main content

Spending Redux

I keep reading about how our slow economy in the first quarter was attributable to the harsh winter weather (it was damn harsh), which somehow kept consumer spending down.  This I don’t understand.  Aren’t there many malls indoors?  In fact, most stores are indoors too.  And, with so much commerce being done on internet sites, it would seem that people desiring to remain indoors and avoid the cold would naturally find themselves more, not less inclined to spend money in order to amuse themselves.  Maybe ice cream sales would slow (I used to scoop ice cream in a Baskin Robbins, so I do know that is true.  What a job that was, by the way!), but that’s about all that should slow in inclement weather.  

My bet is that we are in the midst of a significant structural correction during which the heavy debt burden that exists will damp consumer spending and borrowing and economic vibrancy.  It seems to me that we are completely unprepared on every level for the transition from an industrial to technological driven economy.  Our economic numbers have benefitted for a long time from easy money policies and arbitraging cheap foreign labor.  Those “answers” are probably not the ones that will carry us much farther, and their implementation during the past few decades will surely have consequences that we must deal with straight on.

Wishful thinking and outright lies will not help us, and both have the same impact.  They both lead people into becoming complacent and into taking incorrect actions.  China, which seems to me like a prime example of this, has felt to me like a house of cards for a long time.  I have never believed that government actions can, in a command and control manner, induce sustained economic growth and vibrancy, and neither the central planners in China nor the American Fed have convinced me otherwise.  The recent numbers from the housing industry are highly concerning, and that combined with reinvigorated consumer spending were to be what was to lift us to new economic heights.  My bet is that the recent Fed tapering will be reversed soon and rates will remain low for well past the 2015 targeting that most economists today are projecting. 

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.