Skip to main content

Asset Bubbles

All other things being unchanged, growth in money supply must lead to higher prices of things.  For those higher prices to be sustained they must be supported by commensurately higher wages for the people who buy those things.  If wages don’t keep up with prices, people can’t afford to buy those things, and prices must then fall to meet the level at which demand for the things can be attracted. Economics can be pretty darn simple, no?

The only thing uncertain is the timing or extent of the price increases or the potential for subsequent price declines.  Many factors are in play to influence these things including the globalized economy and the relative health of other nations, the degree of complaining by creditor countries whose U.S. Treasuries get devalued with inflation, the actions of other central bankers, the availability and pricing of credit, the calculus as to how many people will be left behind by inflation (retirees, near retirees, and the unemployed) and what tolerance a society has for that, as well as taxation and regulatory policies.Economics can be so darn complex, no?
I’ve noticed that people in the investment world tend to get so inundated with reports and statistics, much of which is presented in a super complex manner and even with Greek letters, that their glasses fog and eyes glaze, and the obvious is sometimes overlooked.  
Prices of financial assets are very high today, and especially so when taking into consideration the tepid global economic performance and its prospects going forward.  Yields available to investors are thus very low, which could be indicative that the world is very stable andinvestment risk is commensurately low, or that there is an imbalance in the amount of investable funds seeking a return and the amount of investments opportunities for those funds.  If the former, which I think that only a very few would argue is the case today, things are very nice indeed.  If the latter is the case, then trouble lies ahead as imbalances have a way of resolving themselves and mostly in rather violent, unpredictable, and abrupt manners.
The Fed, along with the world’s other major central banks, have been desperately trying to manufacture inflation, apparently hoping that it will lead to real economic vibrancy – including job creation and wage growth.  I must admit to be a skeptic of this theory, and doubt that any form of central planning can actually produce the desired outcome.  In economic parlance, there are two terms used to define growth:  Real and Nominal.  These terms are meant to distinguish between what is real and what is illusory.  Wage growth that occurs because of improved economic vibrancy, mostly due to increased productivity, leads workers to afford an improved lifestyle.  In other words, their wage increases aren’t eaten up by price increases of the things they buy everyday.  This is “Realgrowth.  In these happy times people can afford to buymore and better things, and even have some of their wages left over for savings.  Alternatively, there is inflation-induced growth, or what economists refer to as Nominal(readillusory) growth.  In this case, wage increases are absorbed entirely by increases in the prices of the things one buys regularly such that the opportunity for either buying better or more things, or saving excess earnings, does not exist.  It seems pretty clear to me that our economic leaders, shooting for higher inflation, are setting very modest goals for our nation.  It also seems that the prices of financial assets are disconnected from that reality.

Popular posts from this blog

"No, Not You. You Are Fake News."

"No, not you. You are fake news."  These were the words chosen by our president-elect to shut down a CNN reporter seeking to question him at his recent press conference. Many hearing those words surely recoiled, interpreting them as an affront to freedom and a form of censuring. I reacted quite differently, instead celebrating the moment that a strong leader decided to hold people accountable in a public manner for their actions.

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

James Harden - A Classic Case of Misunderstood Value

The last time I wrote on hoops was December 2013 when I presciently trashed Carmelo Anthony. The time has come to take out my poison pen once again to decry James Harden as a fraud. I know that Harden has amazing stats - third in scoring, first in assists, and that his team the Rockets have far exceeded expectations as they are currently the 3rd seed out west. But, I still maintain that he is an awful player.