Skip to main content


We have all undoubtedly had our experiences with police, and most of us have a bad taste in our mouths as a result.  Whether it be hounding us for motor vehicle violations or, much worse, abusing their positions to harm us, it has become clear that many in the police force have forgotten that their mission is to “Serve and Protect,” and instead have seemed to replace that mantra with something more akin to “Harass and Bully.”

Very recently was the one-year anniversary of the death of a cyclist in the neighborhood where I reside.  The death was of particular concern to me inasmuch as my wife and I, along with thousands of others who live here, enjoy cycling in the streets where the terrain is well known to cyclists throughout the world.   Too many cyclists are hit by motorists on the streets of the U.S. annually by careless or aggressive drivers.  In this particular case the motorist was a police officer and he was busy texting.  If you or I had hit and killed a cyclist while texting and driving we’d be sitting in prison right now, and probably for a very long time.  Somehow, because this man was a police officer on duty, the judge deemed his texting OK and he was acquitted.  What a disgrace!  But, in a country where our lawmakers are exempt from the laws they enact for us, what more should we reasonably expect?

Police, as well as those in political office, work FOR us.  They are not gods with extra powers, immune from the laws they have been hired to either enact or to enforce.  Somehow they need to be reminded of this before things get too far gone.  Where are the checks and balances?

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.