Skip to main content

Understanding Risk

I was sitting with a friend recently and I asked him what he thought of today’s investing world and how he was investing his money.  He told me that he had some real estate investments in partnerships with people he knew and that he had some money in bonds and some even in stocks too, although he knew those were fully priced.  I pressed him on the bond allocation, because at today’s rates I find it very hard to understand why anyone prefers a bond to cash.  The after-tax return just seems like too little to part with the flexibility of having the dry powder.  My friend told me that he had a portfolio of highly rated bonds of varying maturities, with a healthy share being of the 10-year and longer maturity.   He explained to me that he was invested in these because he was seeking to avoid risk, given that stocks and other financial assets seemed to be so fully priced.  I felt so sorry for him at that moment because he, not being an investment professional, was making a fundamental mistake of being focused solely upon credit risk.

It is 100% true that my friend’s credit risk profile was well served by his allocation to longer-term highly rated fixed income securities.  If, or when the stock market retraced some of its recent runup he might be reasonably well insulated.   However, unknown to him, he had traded credit risk for duration and price risk.  As I survey the investment world, it strikes me that my friend is not atypical in his misunderstanding of investment risk.  I see many in today’s market making similar mistakes, both novice investors as well as professionals.  
Duration risk is the risk that in a higher rate/return environment investments with longer maturities/durations such as longer term bonds (or certain equity investments)would lose significant value, leading to acapital loss for those who sell before maturity or foregone opportunity costs for those who have locked up their money for a while in what would then be considered to be below-market returns.  Price risk, which is the cousin of duration risk (if not the sibling), is the risk that prices of whatever it is that you’re buying have been bid up so high that the chances of a correction are quite high.  One can buy great quality assets but if one pays the wrong price for it then that is quite risky indeed.  Ask the investors in Stuyvesant Town, the rock solid portfolio of apartments in Manhattan that some of the smartest real estate investors in the world managed to lose billions of dollars on in 2008 because they paid far more than the asset than they should have.
As my friend Geoff Dohrmann is fond of saying, “It’s a whacky world out there.  Be careful.”  Price risk and duration risk are no less important or risky than credit risk.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.