Skip to main content


Words get coopted and their meanings distorted.  I’ve always been vexed by the words “liberal” and “conservative.”  It has always seemed to me that “liberal” had its roots in “freedom” and “conservative” had its roots in the “conserve” or “save.”  Of course, we all know that both of these words have now taken on mostly political overtones.  “Liberal,” according to Merriam-Webster’s dictionary now means, among other definitions, “believing that government should be active in supporting social and political change.”  It’s amazing to me how that definition came to be, as it seems so far from the word’s root.  This dictionary also lists a few other definitions, including: “not opposed to new ideas or ways of behaving that are not traditional or widely accepted,” as well as; “of or befitting a man of free birth,” which it labels as being archaic, and; “lacking moral restraint,” which it labels as being obsolete.  When I think about the political world, I’m not so sure about this definition’s obsolescence.  

The dictionary defines “conservative” as “believing in the value of established and traditional practices in politics and society.”  It goes on to define a person who is “conservative” as “one who adheres to traditional methods or views” or; “a cautious or discreet person.”

I wonder – Can one be liberal and conservative?  I think I may be.  I definitely am not opposed to new ideas or ways of being or behaving that are not necessarily traditional or widely accepted.  I also feel like I want to always act in a manner befitting a man of free birth.  At the same time, I am also a believer in traditional values, and admire those who act discreetly and maintain a level of caution.

I do know this:  today’s Democratic Party ideas including big government and redistributionist policies are not liberal in the sense that they are not new ideas, nor are they ones befitting men and women of free birth.  I’m not exactly sure what the Republican Party’s ideas really are, so I can’t exactly critique those, but many of its leaders also seem committed to big government.

Maybe someone ought to launch a new party called the Liberal Conservative Party.  I’d join that one.  

Popular posts from this blog

"No, Not You. You Are Fake News."

"No, not you. You are fake news."  These were the words chosen by our president-elect to shut down a CNN reporter seeking to question him at his recent press conference. Many hearing those words surely recoiled, interpreting them as an affront to freedom and a form of censuring. I reacted quite differently, instead celebrating the moment that a strong leader decided to hold people accountable in a public manner for their actions.

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

James Harden - A Classic Case of Misunderstood Value

The last time I wrote on hoops was December 2013 when I presciently trashed Carmelo Anthony. The time has come to take out my poison pen once again to decry James Harden as a fraud. I know that Harden has amazing stats - third in scoring, first in assists, and that his team the Rockets have far exceeded expectations as they are currently the 3rd seed out west. But, I still maintain that he is an awful player.