Skip to main content

I read emails on Friday.

I'm sure most of you, like me, have wondered about the proper etiquette for communication technology.  While it is undeniable that smart phones have improved our lives in numerous ways, it is also true that there are many costs too. Mostly, we are expected to be on call for, and respond to any and every overture (email, text, or voicemail) and in a fairly short time. Like many, I fantasize of abandoning my device entirely and return to a more peaceful existence. 

We probably have all been on both sides of offending situations, for example when an overture is either completely ignored or is responded to after a seemingly long period.  For me deciding when to respond comes down to employing empathy. When I get an overture I must first gauge it's urgency, both to me and the originator. Then I determine it's importance both to me as well as the other individual. And finally I consider the reasonable expectations of the other. Of course, all of this has to fit in with my other calendar considerations. 

I have a very smart friend who has his emails automatically replied to with "I read emails on Friday," along with an offer to contact his assistant if something is truly urgent. I'm thinking that this isn't too bad of an idea. 

I wonder what it means when someone completely ignores an email, seemingly choosing to not reply at all. What, I wonder, is the intended message here?  Is it: "Leave me alone. I couldn't care less about you or your silly email?"  Or is it: "I'm very busy now and this isn't a priority for me?"  I think that even if it were something like this, or something even harsher, it is always better to send something other than a cold shoulder.  Maybe "I'm busy and this isn't interesting to me."  I've always appreciated honest feedback and bet that many others living in today's politically correct world crave it too. I also am perplexed when someone decides to end an email or text conversation abruptly and simply chooses to ignore the last salvo.  To me it is akin to hearing someone say something in person and rather than responding turning and walking away, or hanging up a phone on someone in mid-conversation. People who would never do this in those settings somehow feel it is ok to do it electronically and I cannot for the life of me understand it.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.