Skip to main content

Trusting Authority

As I’ve written in the past, I have the privilege of teaching a business school class at USC.  I’ve got a significant portion of my students who have come to the school from China, which has added a fascinating dimension to the classroom as they bring their own unique perspective that enriches the experience for all.

As I was reading and grading homework this week, I noticed that there seemed to be a consistent trend among my Chinese students to trust government.  The assignment involved explaining the connection between macroeconomics and real estate, and analyzing that relationship as it exists today.  In many, if not most of the submissions from my Chinese students there was a consensus that the U.S. economy is surging.  They pointed to the Q3 GDP of 3.5%, the greatly reduced unemployment levels, and the Fed’s decision to curtail quantitative easing as affirmation that things are sunny for the U.S. economy.  In complete contrast, many, if not most of my non-Chinese students were less optimistic, and pointed to the large percentage of underemployed or those who had abandoned the job market, as well as the imbalanced impact of the past 6 years of monetary policy which seemed in their view to have enriched the already rich and have done little good for the great majority of Americans.

As I read these homework submissions and observed this trend it got me thinking about the cultural proclivities towards things like trusting authority, and what that meant for nations.  I initially concluded that given the central planning structure of Chinese government and its history of limited freedom it should not be surprising that the notion of accepting government proclamations at face value is the norm.  Yet, as I thought some more, I wondered if it was possible that the Chinese students are deeply skeptical of their own nation’s government but view the U.S. government as being highly trustworthy.  I will ask the students this week in class.  Either way, this seems to be a noteworthy and significant difference between the American culture and the Chinese and I would bet that it will likely have broad impact both in each nation’s future as well as how the two nations relate to one another.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.