Skip to main content

The Real Estate Lesson of Radio Shack

Radio Shack filed for bankruptcy recently, and announced that it would close 2,400 stores.  They fell prey to technological advancement that they were ill prepared for, and thus could not offer customers compelling value. The lesson one can infer is that tastes change, technology changes, and thus companies that once were dominant ultimately fall away.  I read recently that nearly 90% of the companies listed in the Fortune 500 in 1955 no longer exist.  This doesn’t surprise me at all.


I began my career in finance, and later migrated to real estate.  In short order I came to appreciate how wonderful real estate was as an investment class.  While companies come and go, the real estate that they occupy, if well located, will remain valuable and will house the next companies that come along to fill the void of the exiting company.  The key phrase to take into account, however, is “well-located.”  Too often I’ve seen investors, especially less-sophisticated, non-institutional ones, fall prey to the seeming attraction of the name tenant that might occupy an entire property, such as a Radio Shack store, and completely overlook the actual viability of the real estate location itself.  By focusing on the lease to the tenant instead of the viability of the real estate itself, this investor is now actually making an investment in corporate credit, missing out on the true benefit that real estate provides.

A wonderful example of this benefit vis-à-vis corporate risk is the flagship Abercrombie and Fitch store on Fifth Avenue in New York City, in what is possible the nation’s most expensive area for retail real estate.  Given the history of fashion companies and the constantly changing public tastes, it is not unreasonable to expect that one day Abercrombie and Fitch will cease to exist.  Investors owning their stock or bonds will suffer mightily, however, the owner of the store they lease on Fifth Avenue will do just fine.  That space, with its super-prime location, will surely attract whichever company is hot and growing at that time.  Conversely, the owner of a Radio Shack store in an off-the-beaten-path location will likely have a hard time finding a new tenant today.  His investment might be worthless.  In the end, well-located real estate trumps corporate risk as a long-term investment.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.