Skip to main content


I live in Los Angeles County, and just moved here this year from New York City.  I regularly visit the San Francisco Bay area as well as San Diego where I have children living as well as business interests.  These areas all share in common a largely affluent and highly educated population.  They also all have terrible traffic problems.  As I sat in some traffic recently my mind drifted again, as it does too often, at the terrible incompetence of government and how we citizens demand virtually nothing of our leaders.  In election season we fall for a few platitudes about change or growth and like complete morons we run to support this politician or that one, never insisting upon hearing real concrete goals and demanding upon hearing concrete action steps that will be taken to improve our lives.

We also generally tend to over-complicate things.  When choosing leaders we often focus on all of the wrong things, such as:  Does he/she have a degree from a great law school?  Is he/she a great public speaker?  Is he/she handsome/pretty?  Where does he/she stand on the abortion issue?  These are all nice, but secondary issues.  We need to have leaders who focus on fixing something tangible that will improve citizens’ lives.  There are many issues to choose from, but traffic seems both worthy and addressable.  Traffic destroys lives, it keeps people from their families, increases stress levels, keeps people from exercising, etc, etc.  I postulate that if an elected official would make fixing traffic his/her only goal, and accomplished it to even a moderate degree, then that individual could rightly be considered among the greatest political leaders of modern times.  In fact, I bet that a third political party called the Traffic Party would have a decent shot of making a big dent in the political landscape.

As an aside, I am speaking at a real estate conference in Los Angeles called RealShare on March 19th at the Hyatt Regency in Century City.  The conference organizers, who are friends and regular blog readers, have offered to give my readers a 15% discount off of the registration.  You can provide the code “PENNERVIP” when registering.  I promise to be entertaining.

Popular posts from this blog

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?

Why Rates Must Remain Low

There is an old bond trader joke that I first heard in the 1980’s when I traded mortgage-backed securities at Drexel Burnham Lambert.  It went like this:  “Upon dying, Albert Einstein finds himself in what he is told is heaven.  He encounters another individual there and asks him what his IQ is.  When he is told that it is 175 he is overjoyed, knowing that he’s found an intellectual peer with whom he can share much.  Upon meeting another, he discovers that person’s IQ is 140 and is pleased to have met another highly intelligent person with whom he can enjoy chess and other pursuits.  He is feeling pretty good about heaven, when he comes across a person who tells him that his IQ is a mere 90, and he is flummoxed.  What, he wonders, is this guy doing in my heaven and what can I even say to this person?  Then it comes to him.  ‘Where,’ he asks, ‘do you think interest rates are heading?’”

CMBS In Flux

The CMBS market has been in a period of upheaval, with dramatic spread widening on bonds and a resulting much more expensive cost of capital for real estate borrowers who depend upon this channel for their debt financing.Market participants today wonder whether we’ve entered a period like the summer of 2011, when spreads on bonds last widened this dramatically and then snapped back within a year to provide tremendous returns for those who were courageous enough to purchase bonds at the time when there was panic selling.Or, people wonder, is this recent downturn a prelude to a structural or systemic problem, like what was experienced in 2007, when spreads widened and sucked investors in, only to punish those early responders with a much more dramatic price collapse in the next 24 months.