Skip to main content

The Limits of Libertarianism

I recently watched an excellent movie called “Fed Up” with my family and friends.  The movie is a must-see for all families as it explains very clearly, in a manner accessible even for young children, why obesity is so prevalent today, and it dispels numerous falsehoods that lead so many down the wrong path.  In short, sugar is the main culprit.  It is apparently 10 times more addictive than cocaine.  The worst offenders are sugary drinks, which enter our bodies with nothing to slow down the liver’s insulin response, thus translating into immediate creation of fat in our bodies.  Food companies that want to continue to sell their products with impunity have paid for studies that blame the obesity epidemic on the sedentary nature of kids today and shift the blame away from their sugary products.  I won’t dwell more on the science, but instead strongly suggest that each person view this film and if you have kids watch it with them.

After the movie we debated the correct societal and governmental response to the facts.  A very libertarian leaning friend felt that it was not government’s responsibility to intervene, fearing that there is a very slippery slope before government is called upon to control all aspects of life and then our freedom to choose for ourselves is sacrificed.  I am personally very sympathetic to this line of thinking and am a huge believer in personal responsibility, however, I believe that freedom is lost once society agrees that there needs to be any social safety net.  At that point, people lose the freedom to keep the rewards of their efforts, and must subsidize the lives and bad choices of others.  As I explained to my friend, if government simply allows the purveyors of sugar to prey upon human beings’ proclivity towards addiction then the consequences will inevitably be borne by all of us in the form of higher taxes to pay for the increased medical care costs that result.  

A true libertarian society is one that in reality no one really wants – a complete free for all.  There is and will continue to be a social safety net to protect our weakest and most vulnerable and lift them up into some reasonable quality of life.  This is the reality and it will never be any other way.  Given this, there must be laws in place to limit the societal costs associated with human weakness. Addictive behaviors that businesses can easily prey upon such as illegal narcotics, sugar, and gambling must be heavily regulated lest their costs to society continue to skyrocket.

Popular posts from this blog

Chicken Kiev with my Apple Pie, Please

I write this piece because I love the foundation upon which our nation was built, and want to preserve that for my kids. In short, I simply cannot abide by a society that is so monolithic in its perspective, so quick to condemn without knowledge, so easily herded into a single way of thinking, and so willing to categorize anyone with a different opinion as being evil or ignorant as how I see society currently operates. It is frightening to me that we’ve descended into a society wherein people are reluctant to speak or question for fear of being ostracized or worse. This is not the country I want for my family.

What If Credit Tightened By Even 1%?

This week I read an article about a company that offers personal loans to folks who are seriously down and out. One of their strategies involves mailing checks for $2,000 to these people’s homes and if the check is cashed it activates a loan agreement that calls for the borrower/check-casher to repay the loan with interest at the incredible rate of 32% per year. Apparently, this is not uncommon and there are many companies engaged in similar business. Of course, like many, my first reaction to this article was dismay or disgust, thinking that these poor and obviously desperate borrowers are being taken advantage of. Then, I began to think to myself what this says about the health of our financial system. I wondered to myself, if this lending were indeed curtailed, thus depriving these borrowers from access to credit, what the impact on the economy might be. I thought: Is it possible that we NEED these people to borrow and spend, lest the economy not achieve targeted growth rates, whic…

The Appeal of Socialism Examined

The political system that we all label “Socialism,” which I might define as one in which government displaces much of the private sector in providing for its citizens (healthcare, education, banking, resources, etc.) and controls the pricing for whatever is left to the private sector to administer, has never once succeeded in its stated objective of equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. In fact, it has always exacerbated the divide between rich and poor and has always led to depressing poverty for the masses. At the same time, free-market capitalism has raised the level of quality of life for most people, and in almost every single instance. And yet today, in the U.S. and elsewhere, we find that large segments of society favor socialism and distrust capitalism. And this is true even as our hemispheric neighbor Venezuela has experienced a complete collapse thanks to the 20-year pursuit of a socialist agenda. It begs the question of how this could be? Does anyone want t…