Skip to main content

The Limits of Libertarianism

I recently watched an excellent movie called “Fed Up” with my family and friends.  The movie is a must-see for all families as it explains very clearly, in a manner accessible even for young children, why obesity is so prevalent today, and it dispels numerous falsehoods that lead so many down the wrong path.  In short, sugar is the main culprit.  It is apparently 10 times more addictive than cocaine.  The worst offenders are sugary drinks, which enter our bodies with nothing to slow down the liver’s insulin response, thus translating into immediate creation of fat in our bodies.  Food companies that want to continue to sell their products with impunity have paid for studies that blame the obesity epidemic on the sedentary nature of kids today and shift the blame away from their sugary products.  I won’t dwell more on the science, but instead strongly suggest that each person view this film and if you have kids watch it with them.

After the movie we debated the correct societal and governmental response to the facts.  A very libertarian leaning friend felt that it was not government’s responsibility to intervene, fearing that there is a very slippery slope before government is called upon to control all aspects of life and then our freedom to choose for ourselves is sacrificed.  I am personally very sympathetic to this line of thinking and am a huge believer in personal responsibility, however, I believe that freedom is lost once society agrees that there needs to be any social safety net.  At that point, people lose the freedom to keep the rewards of their efforts, and must subsidize the lives and bad choices of others.  As I explained to my friend, if government simply allows the purveyors of sugar to prey upon human beings’ proclivity towards addiction then the consequences will inevitably be borne by all of us in the form of higher taxes to pay for the increased medical care costs that result.  

A true libertarian society is one that in reality no one really wants – a complete free for all.  There is and will continue to be a social safety net to protect our weakest and most vulnerable and lift them up into some reasonable quality of life.  This is the reality and it will never be any other way.  Given this, there must be laws in place to limit the societal costs associated with human weakness. Addictive behaviors that businesses can easily prey upon such as illegal narcotics, sugar, and gambling must be heavily regulated lest their costs to society continue to skyrocket.

Popular posts from this blog

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

You Need to Ask the Right Question

If you ask the wrong questions, the answers will probably also always be wrong, and even irrelevant.  This might seem obvious, but I’ve noticed that this truth is often completely overlooked, and even by the world’s most intelligent. While I’m certain this is so in every facet of life, for the purpose of this short paper I will focus on the investment/finance world.

We, The Deplorables

I recently saw a German movie called “Look Who’s Back” on Netflix, which I strongly recommend.  The film fictionally chronicles the return of Adolf Hitler to modern-day Germany and does a tremendous job of illustrating how Hitler’s call to arms for a better Germany for Germans resonates with the average German in the film. It cannot be lost on anyone who views this film that the message repeatedly heard from these average Germans that “what he says is mostly true…” is a frightening one, and one that is easy to imagine not only Germans saying but French, British, and Americans too.