Skip to main content

When a Nation Goes Bad Everyone’s To Blame

The Nazi’s of Germany are broadly considered to represent the extreme evil that humankind can embody.  In response to this evil, military efforts led by the U.S. and Western Europe destroyed much of Germany.  Bombing raids destroyed civilian life in many of Germany’s largest cities, and death and destruction was visited upon its population.  Surely not every German was a Nazi, and many were likely opposed to them.  The bombs, however, did not discriminate between the true believers or those opposed, and the destruction of everyday life affected all.


There are many lessons that can be learned from studying this period in history, but one that is not too frequently discussed is how each member of a society bears real responsibility for what goes on, who leads it, and what actions it takes.  And each citizen will pay the consequences, or enjoy the benefits of the decisions of its leaders.  The U.S. is just about to begin the long run to decide who will be its next President.  It is time for we Americans to decide who will be the face of our nation to the world, and whose values and ideas will represent all of ours.

As I write this I reflect upon America’s current leadership’s seemingly desperate and maybe even reckless attempt to sign a nuclear deal at almost any cost or terms with an Iranian regime that by its own admission supports terrorism around the world, leads mass chants of “Death to America,” and is openly committed to the destruction of another nation.  If this deal is signed it will surely lead to reactions around the world, and it would be hard for America, who led the charge in making this agreement with Iran happen, to not bear significant responsibility for these aftereffects.  It is not enough for Americans, or for any nation’s citizens, to sit back and allow its leadership to drive off a cliff.  An entire nation is by definition complicit in the actions of its leadership, and will necessarily be held accountable.

Popular posts from this blog

Chicken Kiev with my Apple Pie, Please

I write this piece because I love the foundation upon which our nation was built, and want to preserve that for my kids. In short, I simply cannot abide by a society that is so monolithic in its perspective, so quick to condemn without knowledge, so easily herded into a single way of thinking, and so willing to categorize anyone with a different opinion as being evil or ignorant as how I see society currently operates. It is frightening to me that we’ve descended into a society wherein people are reluctant to speak or question for fear of being ostracized or worse. This is not the country I want for my family.

What If Credit Tightened By Even 1%?

This week I read an article about a company that offers personal loans to folks who are seriously down and out. One of their strategies involves mailing checks for $2,000 to these people’s homes and if the check is cashed it activates a loan agreement that calls for the borrower/check-casher to repay the loan with interest at the incredible rate of 32% per year. Apparently, this is not uncommon and there are many companies engaged in similar business. Of course, like many, my first reaction to this article was dismay or disgust, thinking that these poor and obviously desperate borrowers are being taken advantage of. Then, I began to think to myself what this says about the health of our financial system. I wondered to myself, if this lending were indeed curtailed, thus depriving these borrowers from access to credit, what the impact on the economy might be. I thought: Is it possible that we NEED these people to borrow and spend, lest the economy not achieve targeted growth rates, whic…

The Appeal of Socialism Examined

The political system that we all label “Socialism,” which I might define as one in which government displaces much of the private sector in providing for its citizens (healthcare, education, banking, resources, etc.) and controls the pricing for whatever is left to the private sector to administer, has never once succeeded in its stated objective of equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. In fact, it has always exacerbated the divide between rich and poor and has always led to depressing poverty for the masses. At the same time, free-market capitalism has raised the level of quality of life for most people, and in almost every single instance. And yet today, in the U.S. and elsewhere, we find that large segments of society favor socialism and distrust capitalism. And this is true even as our hemispheric neighbor Venezuela has experienced a complete collapse thanks to the 20-year pursuit of a socialist agenda. It begs the question of how this could be? Does anyone want t…