Skip to main content

Does Greece Really Need More Greeks?

It is commonly accepted among most economists that what ails the developed world today is too little procreation.  The thinking goes that in order for a generation to retire it must create at least as many offspring who would support them in their retirement.  Those who adhere to this belief point to the very low reproductive rates in places like Japan and Western Europe and foresee a long and slippery slide to economic disaster, where there won’t be enough in taxes paid by a shrinking population to support the retiring generation.

I’ve always been very confused by this line of thinking inasmuch as it seems to be overly simplistic – placing an emphasis on sheer numbers without any regard for the issue of productivity.  To me, the math around this has everything to do with productivity and very little to do with absolute population count.  That is to say, what the world needs now is more productive people, not more unproductive ones.  In point of fact, the unproductive ones actually compete with, and drain from the pool of resources otherwise available to retirees.  So, just looking at sheer numbers is dumb.  In fact, I would say that in today’s Information/Technology Era healthier societies will be characterized by smaller populations, and possibly shrinking ones, but filled with educated and productive people.  Greece doesn’t really need more Greeks, per se, but instead more productive Greeks.  Japan doesn’t need more Japanese, Germany doesn’t need more Germans, and the U.S. doesn’t need more Americans, just more productive citizens, and arguably fewer in absolute numbers.  I’d bet that the world would do just fine with a 50% population shrinkage, but with all of them producing at a higher level.

Popular posts from this blog

"No, Not You. You Are Fake News."

"No, not you. You are fake news."  These were the words chosen by our president-elect to shut down a CNN reporter seeking to question him at his recent press conference. Many hearing those words surely recoiled, interpreting them as an affront to freedom and a form of censuring. I reacted quite differently, instead celebrating the moment that a strong leader decided to hold people accountable in a public manner for their actions.

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

James Harden - A Classic Case of Misunderstood Value

The last time I wrote on hoops was December 2013 when I presciently trashed Carmelo Anthony. The time has come to take out my poison pen once again to decry James Harden as a fraud. I know that Harden has amazing stats - third in scoring, first in assists, and that his team the Rockets have far exceeded expectations as they are currently the 3rd seed out west. But, I still maintain that he is an awful player.