Skip to main content

Deutsche Bank Part II – Going Nowhere Fast

A few weeks ago I published an article called “Deutsche Bank” that seemed to capture significant reader interest. To summarize, it made the point that a Glass-Steagall like legislation prohibiting institutions investing taxpayer insured deposits from financial risk taking was a pretty good idea. Now I write again, inspired by the continuing news surrounding this historic German institution.
It has recently been disclosed that in 2015 Deutsche Bank barely passed the European Central Bank’s stress test, and did so because the ECB counted as capital $4B that DB was to have received from the planned but not-yet-closed sale of a Chinese lending subsidiary. Counting this $4B was in direct violation of the rules of the stress tests in that the sale was not closed, and today, more than a year later, is still not closed. Of course, the reasoning of the ECB was clear. Keeping the world calm was far more important than holding DB’s feet to the fire. This speaks to the fragility of our global financial system.


And yet, with today’s unprecedented government intervention and a seemingly rock solid global commitment to backstop all large banks and keep asset values fully inflated, perhaps things are less fragile than one might initially surmise.

In 2007 after an unprecedented two-decade boom in global finance (read: leverage) which created an illusion of prosperity, the world began to fall apart and most of the asset value gains from the prior decades began to unravel in the most unwieldy fashion. Aghast at the prospect of a severe global depression, governments and central banks utilized tools previously not even considered in order to avert that outcome and to buy more time. Today, in the wake of that moment, global governments and central banks remain in firm control of the financial system and are holding on dearly to their commitment to sustain asset value levels and thus global wealth levels. It should be clear to all that if these manipulative forces were to be released, the air would likely come out of the bubble quite similarly, and perhaps even more chaotically than what was witnessed in the 2008/09 period.

There is much bemoaning from free market advocates (like me) that the world we once knew and loved is no more. That notion is right, but now we must ask what would be worse: continued manipulation or a chaotic unwind? I’m not sure there is a middle ground, and all of the “taper tantrums” that occur at the mere suggestion of loosened manipulation would seem to reinforce that doubt.

In short, DB will survive. So will all the other TBTF banks. Rates will remain ultra low and asset values pretty high, although not without some sorting out between a few real losers and the rest. Investors will remain challenged to produce any yield to speak of, and people will need to tighten their collective belts to muddle through a likely prolonged period of correction and transition. Populations will ultimately right-size, and education systems will be modernized to help young people prepare properly for the jobs of today and the future, rather than the permanently lost jobs of the past. There will be some breathtaking winners along the way but the likely journey for most will involve hunkering down. If a government official decides to go off script, like the one who recently said idiotically that there was no way the German government would ever take a stake in DB, or a central banker who decides to test the waters with an increase in rates, the market will punish quickly and put everyone back on script.

Popular posts from this blog

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

You Need to Ask the Right Question

If you ask the wrong questions, the answers will probably also always be wrong, and even irrelevant.  This might seem obvious, but I’ve noticed that this truth is often completely overlooked, and even by the world’s most intelligent. While I’m certain this is so in every facet of life, for the purpose of this short paper I will focus on the investment/finance world.

We, The Deplorables

I recently saw a German movie called “Look Who’s Back” on Netflix, which I strongly recommend.  The film fictionally chronicles the return of Adolf Hitler to modern-day Germany and does a tremendous job of illustrating how Hitler’s call to arms for a better Germany for Germans resonates with the average German in the film. It cannot be lost on anyone who views this film that the message repeatedly heard from these average Germans that “what he says is mostly true…” is a frightening one, and one that is easy to imagine not only Germans saying but French, British, and Americans too.