Skip to main content

Greed & Laziness

In this most contentious and fascinating of election cycles, when nearly each conversation leads to politics, and when polarization runs so high, I ask myself - what is the essence of the debate between left and right?  What does it really mean to be a Conservative or a Liberal?


I often ask friends this question when engaged in heated and polarized political discussions and have generally been dissatisfied with the answers – which have included: “Conservatives are pro-life;” and “Liberals are committed to wealth redistribution.”  I think that in the end each focuses upon solving for two very different human frailties – greed and laziness- and for prioritizing one over the other.  The Conservative is devoted to free market capitalism and small government, and thus seems to be solving for human beings’ natural tendency towards inertia.  The system of putting people on the treadmill and rewarding those who are most productive seems to me to be designed to inspire hard work and to overcome the tendency to be lazy.  On the other hand, today’s Liberal agenda is dedicated to larger government and is naturally uncomfortable with the free market system – seemingly aiming to solve for human greed, which in the unfettered free market system can move those in power to act in a manner that can be antagonistic to society’s best interests.

I surmise that there is a constant tug of war between these factions and at any given point in time a society is out of balance in one way or the other, and thus needs the pendulum to swing in order to counteract whichever of these two human flaws is most dominant in the moment.

Without judging, but instead just commenting as an observer, it would seem to me that, perhaps in the wake of the ’08 financial crisis and combined with a very lethargic global economy that holds less promise for wealth creation, the pendulum has swung towards the system of increased government and less free market capitalism.  I dare say that this movement will likely dominate for some time to come, until ultimately desperation for productivity causes the pendulum to swing the other way.

The last pendulum swing in this direction occurred in the early 1960’s and lasted until the late ‘70’s or early ‘80’s. This period of time was characterized by a focus on social justice, environmental safety, free-spiritedness, a de-emphasizing of, if not a disdain for capital and materialism, and very creative artistic expression.  With the likelihood of further de-criminalization of cannabis on the immediate horizon, the similarities to the Hippie Generation become increasingly relevant.

Popular posts from this blog

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

You Need to Ask the Right Question

If you ask the wrong questions, the answers will probably also always be wrong, and even irrelevant.  This might seem obvious, but I’ve noticed that this truth is often completely overlooked, and even by the world’s most intelligent. While I’m certain this is so in every facet of life, for the purpose of this short paper I will focus on the investment/finance world.

We, The Deplorables

I recently saw a German movie called “Look Who’s Back” on Netflix, which I strongly recommend.  The film fictionally chronicles the return of Adolf Hitler to modern-day Germany and does a tremendous job of illustrating how Hitler’s call to arms for a better Germany for Germans resonates with the average German in the film. It cannot be lost on anyone who views this film that the message repeatedly heard from these average Germans that “what he says is mostly true…” is a frightening one, and one that is easy to imagine not only Germans saying but French, British, and Americans too.