Skip to main content

Trump Wins; The Earth Remains Round

There is so much to say, and yet I feel like saying very little. Here are a few observations that I felt like sharing:



1.   Contrarianism in America is alive and well. The majority opinion is incorrect a fairly high percentage of the time. This truth was on display big time in this election. Perhaps, if you find yourself in the majority opinion camp on an issue, you might reflect a bit and wonder how and if you might be wrong, and whether the opposing ideas have merit.

2.   Those proclaiming to be most sensitive to intolerance are too often the most intolerant. Again, not to beat a dead horse, but ignoring the possibility that you may just be wrong and then judging those with opposing views to yours harshly is probably not the best way to go through life. Those who dismiss opinions that contradict their own as being patently ignorant, and who judge those who express these opinions with disdain (“The Deplorables”) are forgetting that at one time those who questioned whether the earth was indeed flat were put to death. Tolerance is not the antidote to cruelty, but instead to ignorance.

3.   Democracy is an institution that requires humility. You won’t always get your way, and that’s a good thing. Whining when you don’t, or threatening to run away to another country defiles the notion of democracy. It’s also a pretty good indicator of your partnership capabilities.

4.   The harsh realities that we face as a nation haven’t changed. We have $20T of debt, impossibly large unfunded pension liabilities that don’t appear likely to be met, a hopelessly bad public education system, a terrible infrastructure system, and a large disenfranchised percentage of citizens who have been left behind economically. Facing this honestly will be the first step towards improving our situation. Godspeed to Mr. Trump and to all those who sign up to meet these challenges.

5.   The media and the celebrity class are irrelevant. We pay way too much attention to these groups. They don’t represent us and they take up way too much of our collective time and consciousness. Who cares what any of these people think? His or her opinions are no more or less valid than anyone else’s. It’s probably a good ideal to talk to your family, friends and neighbors more and to waste less time listening to these strangers and watching them on TV.

6.   Lower tax rates are generally bullish for markets and economies. It means that less money runs through the inefficient hands of government. And, for those less financially savvy, money saved is not horded under mattresses. These savings are invested and loaned, and thus stimulates real economic growth and helps create attractive opportunities. Private sector allocations are almost always more efficiently handled than public sector, because the profit motive inspires that efficiency which contrasts with the cronyism that more typifies public sector economic activity. The thought that a Trump win would be bad for markets, with his plan to demolish tax rates, and that a Clinton win, with her plan to significantly increase them, would be good, was always laughably off-base.

Popular posts from this blog

Chicken Kiev with my Apple Pie, Please

I write this piece because I love the foundation upon which our nation was built, and want to preserve that for my kids. In short, I simply cannot abide by a society that is so monolithic in its perspective, so quick to condemn without knowledge, so easily herded into a single way of thinking, and so willing to categorize anyone with a different opinion as being evil or ignorant as how I see society currently operates. It is frightening to me that we’ve descended into a society wherein people are reluctant to speak or question for fear of being ostracized or worse. This is not the country I want for my family.

What If Credit Tightened By Even 1%?

This week I read an article about a company that offers personal loans to folks who are seriously down and out. One of their strategies involves mailing checks for $2,000 to these people’s homes and if the check is cashed it activates a loan agreement that calls for the borrower/check-casher to repay the loan with interest at the incredible rate of 32% per year. Apparently, this is not uncommon and there are many companies engaged in similar business. Of course, like many, my first reaction to this article was dismay or disgust, thinking that these poor and obviously desperate borrowers are being taken advantage of. Then, I began to think to myself what this says about the health of our financial system. I wondered to myself, if this lending were indeed curtailed, thus depriving these borrowers from access to credit, what the impact on the economy might be. I thought: Is it possible that we NEED these people to borrow and spend, lest the economy not achieve targeted growth rates, whic…

The Appeal of Socialism Examined

The political system that we all label “Socialism,” which I might define as one in which government displaces much of the private sector in providing for its citizens (healthcare, education, banking, resources, etc.) and controls the pricing for whatever is left to the private sector to administer, has never once succeeded in its stated objective of equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. In fact, it has always exacerbated the divide between rich and poor and has always led to depressing poverty for the masses. At the same time, free-market capitalism has raised the level of quality of life for most people, and in almost every single instance. And yet today, in the U.S. and elsewhere, we find that large segments of society favor socialism and distrust capitalism. And this is true even as our hemispheric neighbor Venezuela has experienced a complete collapse thanks to the 20-year pursuit of a socialist agenda. It begs the question of how this could be? Does anyone want t…