Skip to main content

The End of The Financial Supercycle

Since I graduated college nearly 35 years ago the yield on the 10-Year U.S. Treasury bond has declined from near 16% to today’s 2%-2.5% trading range level, and this tells an important story. The massive decline in yields on all financial instruments during this period, which I will call a “Financial Supercycle”, and the concurrent expansion of multiples and thus valuations, has led to massive wealth creation which has served to bolster the overall economy by literally infusing trillions of dollars of capital in the form of both found money (gains) and loans (recycled savings). In that same time, the field of finance and investments was red hot, growing dramatically in size and expanding in a multitude of ways, spurred by an abundance of creativity that spawned new ways to borrow and new ways to invest.  Innovations that have been introduced during this time and have heightened and broadened access to capital include entire financial markets such as the junk bond/high yield bond market, the residential mortgage-backed securities market, the asset-backed securities market, the commercial mortgage-backed securities market, and the various swap and options markets; loan products like those for subprime home borrowers, home equity, and adjustable rate; and many types of structured finance investment products such as ETF’s, REIT’s,  CMO’s, CDO’s, hedge funds, and CLO’s. During these 35 years borrowing and investing have both ballooned, as have employment and compensation levels in the finance industry.

That trend, which originated in the U.S. but became global, is now dead. Easy profits will no longer be available to investors as yields either remain historically low or trend higher and thus diminish the value of their financial assets. Employment opportunities as well as compensation levels for the finance sector have both long ago peaked, and will continue to be under siege – falling victim to the deadly combination of the low yield environment, technological efficiencies, and the already record high levels of indebtedness that will continue to stymie governmental efforts to stimulate the borrow-and-spend formula that has been employed for so long to produce what has passed for economic vibrancy.

The ramifications of the death of this Supercycle will be many.  There will be micro-effects such as the impact that will be felt in the New York area housing market and others like it that have long been dependent upon legions of high-earning financiers and traders. Those effects will harm some, but it will be the macro-effects that will be the ones that we’ll all care a lot more about.  Mostly, economic recoveries will likely be tepid at best, weighed down by massive debt burdens and population levels that are disconnected from the realities of gainful employment opportunities. In past times recoveries could be easily manufactured by the Fed - either by managing rates lower or by allowing easier lending policies in the form of increased bank leverage (remember the CDO squared?).  Today, with financial assets already at peak prices, debt at historical high levels, and rates are about as low as they can go, the Fed doesn’t have too much left in its arsenal.

Deflation is a force that is natural, but in a world filled with debtor nations addicted to borrowing it is a force that is dreaded and one that governments have used all their powers to fend off. However, natural forces are inevitable, and it would not be surprising to me to see deflationary forces appear once again in the coming years, if only for some period. I can imagine tax reform, if it ever passes, giving the economy a boost. However, I cannot imagine that having a longer-term positive impact given the fiscal imbalances that exist and that seem politically intractable. The same is true for any boost that might result from governmental infrastructure spending.

Popular posts from this blog

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

You Need to Ask the Right Question

If you ask the wrong questions, the answers will probably also always be wrong, and even irrelevant.  This might seem obvious, but I’ve noticed that this truth is often completely overlooked, and even by the world’s most intelligent. While I’m certain this is so in every facet of life, for the purpose of this short paper I will focus on the investment/finance world.

Interest Rates & The Trade War

These are the twin bogeymen that the hysterical media will continue to lean on to drive fear into the hearts of men and women and keep them glued to their TV sets for the predictable backwards looking drivel. Here is a different perspective for you to chew on:

Interest rates cannot go up by too much. Our nation has to service more than $20T of national debt and must also maintain a massive social safety net that will increase that debt by a further 50% before Trump’s second term ends. All the rest of the analysis is unimportant.