Skip to main content

The Price of Societal Dishonesty

We have all heard the label “Political Correctness,” or its abbreviated form “PC.” It is a term used to describe the state of a society that inhibits the use of certain language or certain behaviors that it deems to be “incorrect,” or perhaps better said – offensive. The concept of political correctness has been with us for some time now, maybe tracing its roots back to the 60’s when the fight against discrimination took off in America, but it has clearly picked up steam big time in the past decade or so. In fact, we now see PC warriors – those who are militant – fighting to repress any group who might express views that they deem to be distasteful.  The incredible irony is that a movement that sought to enhance freedoms of those who were thought to be downtrodden or discriminated against by society, is now itself committed to extinguishing the freedom of others.


I dislike like the term “Political Correctness,” and feel that, like all Orwellian terms, it understates the toxicity of the philosophy. I prefer the term “Societal Dishonesty,” which I believe captures the essence much better. Of course, I’m not so na├»ve to know that discrimination exists and it is indeed ugly. I’ve been on the wrong end of it many times. But, I also believe that it cannot and must not be suppressed by edict but rather by shining the light of day on the ignorance that always underscores it.

Further, I am certain that we all pay a tremendous price because of this newfound intolerance, and this price has a few components to it. These include:

1.The erosion of freedom – If it is ok for government to dictate what we cannot say, then where will that end?

2.The perpetuation of a victim mentality among too large and growing segment of our population – When groups organize around collective victimhood the outcomes can never be good, as they will always seek retribution rather than invest their energies more productively;

3.The perpetuation of bad ideas that results from an absence of debate – There was a time when those who would dare to suggest that the earth was not flat would be put to death. Discouraging debate stifles evolution and retards a society. There are too many topics that are taboo today, and our unwillingness to deal with them candidly and debate them openly is and will continue to cost us dearly.

Popular posts from this blog

Chicken Kiev with my Apple Pie, Please

I write this piece because I love the foundation upon which our nation was built, and want to preserve that for my kids. In short, I simply cannot abide by a society that is so monolithic in its perspective, so quick to condemn without knowledge, so easily herded into a single way of thinking, and so willing to categorize anyone with a different opinion as being evil or ignorant as how I see society currently operates. It is frightening to me that we’ve descended into a society wherein people are reluctant to speak or question for fear of being ostracized or worse. This is not the country I want for my family.

What If Credit Tightened By Even 1%?

This week I read an article about a company that offers personal loans to folks who are seriously down and out. One of their strategies involves mailing checks for $2,000 to these people’s homes and if the check is cashed it activates a loan agreement that calls for the borrower/check-casher to repay the loan with interest at the incredible rate of 32% per year. Apparently, this is not uncommon and there are many companies engaged in similar business. Of course, like many, my first reaction to this article was dismay or disgust, thinking that these poor and obviously desperate borrowers are being taken advantage of. Then, I began to think to myself what this says about the health of our financial system. I wondered to myself, if this lending were indeed curtailed, thus depriving these borrowers from access to credit, what the impact on the economy might be. I thought: Is it possible that we NEED these people to borrow and spend, lest the economy not achieve targeted growth rates, whic…

The Appeal of Socialism Examined

The political system that we all label “Socialism,” which I might define as one in which government displaces much of the private sector in providing for its citizens (healthcare, education, banking, resources, etc.) and controls the pricing for whatever is left to the private sector to administer, has never once succeeded in its stated objective of equitable distribution of resources and opportunities. In fact, it has always exacerbated the divide between rich and poor and has always led to depressing poverty for the masses. At the same time, free-market capitalism has raised the level of quality of life for most people, and in almost every single instance. And yet today, in the U.S. and elsewhere, we find that large segments of society favor socialism and distrust capitalism. And this is true even as our hemispheric neighbor Venezuela has experienced a complete collapse thanks to the 20-year pursuit of a socialist agenda. It begs the question of how this could be? Does anyone want t…