Skip to main content

Everyone Deserves A Shot at Happiness

The polarization in U.S. politics has reached a nearly untenable divide. If one party gains control of the federal government roughly half the U.S. population feels completely disenfranchised, and when the other party does so then the other half experiences that same feeling. This is not the way a nation can succeed, and in fact it seems apparent that ours is getting torn apart day by day.

The problem is that the divide is philosophical and neither side can be mollified by logic or persuaded to give the other side a chance without doing their utmost best to impede their chances of success. Look at the ridiculous Trump impeachment talk, which has no basis and yet is constant on the left today. If the left feared that Trump was so off base, why wouldn’t they just stand aside and let him fail, then in two years regain control of Congress and two years later the presidency too? The thing is, they are petrified that he won’t fail and that their ideology might be marginalized more permanently than just one four-year term.

I am clearly partisan in this argument. My philosophy on life and how a society ought to be organized runs towards the concepts of merit, hard work, accountability and responsibility, learning from mistakes and growing, respect for others including their property, and a deep-seated belief that government power needs to be kept in check, because unlike the private sector it has no natural competition to provide checks and balance. I am most decidedly not in favor of irresponsibility, racism of any kind, victimhood, societal dishonesty (nee: political correctness), and a government that attempts to shield us from our life’s journey of discovery and growth even in the name of improving our lives, all the while creating dependency.

Now, with that said, I respect deeply every person’s right to live according to their own standards, as long as they don’t inhibit my journey. Some of our founding fathers like Thomas Jefferson understood this and were deeply opposed to allowing for a growing federal government, instead favoring more powerful state and local government. Of course, we all know that accountability is markedly improved when we can look our leaders in the eye at church or at the little league baseball field or the local diner. But what is equally valuable from the Jeffersonian vision is that people can shop for the society they desire. If, say, California is too progressive for someone more right-thinking, he can move to Arizona, or Texas, or elsewhere, and live happily among likeminded citizens, and be subject to governance that lines up with his ideas. The only real way that the U.S. can move forward from this highly divided place it finds itself in today is to push most of the government-related matters onto states, and reduce the sphere of influence of the federal government to mostly national security matters.

An interesting by-product of this will be for us to see which states pursuing which societal frameworks does better or worse. I have my strong bets, and one need only look at Venezuela or Brazil for clues.

Popular posts from this blog

Taxes and Hyperbole

There is a new tax code in the U.S., and this is indeed a “Yuuuge” deal. As far as I can tell, it is as close to an unmitigated home run for America as can be. Is it perfect? Of course, it’s not. The code retains its unwieldy size and complexity, largely as a result of compromises made in order to bribe congressmen and senators for their votes. Until we get term limits, it seems we’re stuck with a tax code that is big and complex. However, it does hit the mark on a few key issues: most every taxpayer will now pay less to the federal government (except those in states with ridiculously mismanaged economies who now will be forced to hold their state politicians more accountable); and our businesses, large and small alike, will remit less of their profits to the federal government and will be liberated to invest that savings into growth – which will surely create job and wage growth in the productive private sector.

James Harden - A Classic Case of Misunderstood Value

The last time I wrote on hoops was December 2013 when I presciently trashed Carmelo Anthony. The time has come to take out my poison pen once again to decry James Harden as a fraud. I know that Harden has amazing stats - third in scoring, first in assists, and that his team the Rockets have far exceeded expectations as they are currently the 3rd seed out west. But, I still maintain that he is an awful player.

The End of The Financial Supercycle

Since I graduated college nearly 35 years ago the yield on the 10-Year U.S. Treasury bond has declined from near 16% to today’s 2%-2.5% trading range level, and this tells an important story. The massive decline in yields on all financial instruments during this period, which I will call a “Financial Supercycle”, and the concurrent expansion of multiples and thus valuations, has led to massive wealth creation which has served to bolster the overall economy by literally infusing trillions of dollars of capital in the form of both found money (gains) and loans (recycled savings). In that same time, the field of finance and investments was red hot, growing dramatically in size and expanding in a multitude of ways, spurred by an abundance of creativity that spawned new ways to borrow and new ways to invest.  Innovations that have been introduced during this time and have heightened and broadened access to capital include entire financial markets such as the junk bond/high yield bond marke…